The Organic Infinite Positive Feedback Circuit Loop, Version 14

Nerdvana

JJJJJJJJ. Infinity (Positive only) with Infinite Math

Infinite returns with Equation with Positivism in 5 months

Mathematicians Measure Infinites

Infinity comes in more than one size. Might there be some sizes we don’t yet know about? The question is one of the biggest in mathematics. A surprising recent proof shows that two different infinite sets, long thought to have different sizes, are actually the same.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-measure-infinities-find-theyre-equal-20170912/?utm_content=buffer4e481&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

“If it’s true that everything can be divided to infinity, then infinity is within you.” – Nassim Haramein

Infinite

http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/an-infinite-god-is-more-mathematician-than-theologian?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1494343774

Abstract syncs with Quantum Mechanics and returns with Positivism

Each department of knowledge passes through three stages. The theoretic stage; the theological stage and the metaphysical or abstract stage – Auguste Comte

Positivism is a philosophical theory stating that positive[clarification needed] knowledge is based on natural phenomena and their properties and relations. Thus, information derived from sensory experience, interpreted through reason and logic, forms the exclusive source of all authoritative[clarification needed] knowledge.[1] Positivism holds that valid knowledge (certitude or truth) is found only in this derived knowledge[clarification needed].[2]

Abstract, Quantum Mechanics, Wave Mechanics, Tesla

https://quantummicromechanics.wordpress.com/2015/02/03/soul-body-vibration-by-mohsen-paul-sarfarazi-ph-d/?preview=true&preview_id=311&preview_nonce=b5773d242d&iframe=true

Physicists/Mathematicians/Scientists/Metaphysicians on God returns in 4 days with Pantheism, Heisenberg, Campbell, Nin, Einstein, and Harmony (Pythagorean Harmonics)

Faith

http://bigthink.com/videos/neil-degrasse-tyson-on-science-and-faith?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1490887894

Einstein with God as Energy, Mathematician and Physicist

Some (including the scientist himself) have called Einstein’s spiritual views as pantheism, largely influenced by the philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Pantheists see God as existing but abstract, equating all of reality with divinity. They also reject a specific personal God or a god that is somehow endowed with human attributes.

Himself a famous atheist, Richard Dawkins calls Einstein’s pantheism a “sexed-up atheism,” but other scholars point to the fact that Einstein did seem to believe in a supernatural intelligence that’s beyond the physical world. He referred to it in his writings as “a superior spirit,” “a superior mind” and a “spirit vastly superior to men”.

http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/albert-einsteins-surprising-thoughts-on-the-meaning-of-life?utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#link_time=1489413842

Is Physics the next guru?

https://www.deepakchopra.com/blog/article/5185

Where did Mathematics come from?

http://www.kcet.org/shows/deepak_chopra_the_future_of_god/deepak-chopra-the-future-of-god.html

Is God a Mathematician?

http://www.inspireactachieve.com/consciousness/respected-scientist-claims-he-has-found-definitive-proof-that-god-exists/

“The mathematician’s patterns, like the painter’s or the poet’s, must be beautiful; the ideas, like the colours or the words, must fit together in a harmonious way. Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics.”

– G. H. Hardy

“Mathematics is the language with which God has written the universe”

~ Galileo Galilei

Miracle #22128

“Happiness is neither without us nor within us. It is in God, both without us and within us.” — Blaise Pascal Thank you!

“I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.”

~ Frank Lloyd Wright

Einstein was comfortable with fluid boundaries, as one sees in a famous quote of his: “I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details.” https://www.deepakchopra.com/blog/article/5287

Miracle #10334

“In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God’s existence.” — Sir Isaac Newton Thank you!

Miracle #2548

“Know thyself, and thou shalt know the universe and God.” — Pythagoras Thank you!

Miracle #7800

Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but as a question. — Niels Bohr Thank you!

The Man Who Knew Infinity

On Channeling

Ramanujan: You wanted to know how I get my ideas.

Mmm.

My God.

Namagiri.

She speaks to me.

Puts formulas on my tongue when I sleep,

sometimes when I pray.

Do you believe me?

Because if you are my friend, then you

will know that I’m telling you the truth.

If you are truly my friend.

Hardy

But I don’t believe in God.

I don’t believe in anything I can’t prove.

Then you can’t believe in me.

Ramanujan

Don’t you see?

An equation has no meaning to me

unless it expresses a thought of God.

On Miracles

LITTLEWOOD: My dear Harold,

please forgive

this personal transgression.

I’m gone now to this god-awful war

and haven’t the faintest idea

if I will ever return.

Fortunately, unlike you,

I do have God to take comfort in.

I have two points to make.

The first is

that Ramanujan’s work on primes,

while brilliant in itself, is actually wrong.

The other point is less straightforward.

You have in Ramanujan

nothing short of a miracle.

The man exceeds any notion of brilliance

that I have ever understood.

Forget Jacobi,

we can compare him with Newton.

I have come to believe

that for Ramanujan,

every single positive integer

is one of his personal friends.

On Breakthroughs

So, now we see the work on partitions

and the enormous

breakthrough that has been achieved.

All this, mind you,

by a man whose limitations

of knowledge when I met him

were as startling as was its profundity.

Opinions may differ as to the

importance of Ramanujan’s work

and the influence it may or may not

have on the mathematics of the future,

but one gift it does show

is its profound and invincible originality.

Mr. Littlewood once told me

that “every positive integer is one

of Ramanujan’s personal friends.”

I believe this to be true.

He told me that

an equation for him had no meaning

unless it expressed a thought of God.

Well, despite everything in my

being set to the contrary,

perhaps he is right.

For is this not exactly our

justification for pure mathematics?

We are merely explorers of infinity

in the pursuit of absolute perfection.

We do not invent

these formulae, they already exist

and lie in wait for only the very

brightest of minds, like Ramanujan,

ever to divine and prove.

So, in the end,

I have been forced to consider,

who are we to question Ramanujan,

let alone God?

“I think he has the finest mind I’ve seen in my lifetime.”

Bertrand Russell: “You should let him run.”

Srinivasa Ramanujan: What do you see?

Janaki: Sand.

[he picks up a handful of sand]

Srinivasa Ramanujan: Imagine if we could look so closely we could see each grain, each particle. You see there are patterns in everything.

Today, you are being invited to look at the infinite picture. In comparison to the joy, happiness and love you experience, the negative is just a minuscule piece. The Universe is giving you the opportunity to see the entire puzzle and how everything fits into it. And, once you see it, there is no going back. (Smiling) Are you ready and willing to allow? ~ Creator

https://thecreatorwritings.wordpress.com/2019/09/15/the-infinite-picture/